While the increased use of airstrikes has already become an entrenched pattern, the liberalization of gun law ownership and the imposition of martial law show that devastating airstrikes are not enough for the junta. The people’s resistance, in both its civilian and armed forms, remains resolute, but the junta will only resort to more destructive measures as it desperately attempts to take control of the country.
A new policy liberalizing gun ownership rules, increasingly resorting to indiscriminate airstrikes, the razing to the ground of homes and villages, as well as the recent imposition of martial law in more townships signify an increasingly desperate junta that is failing to take power in the face of stern resistance. Despite these desperate measures, however, the humanitarian toll it is taking for people on the ground only underscores the need for an urgent increase in humanitarian assistance to be channeled through Myanmar’s extensive network of grassroots civil society and community-based organizations.
As revealed by Myanmar Now, a leaked document shows a recent change in policy from the junta’s Ministry of Home Affairs to encourage military supporters to access and own firearms by applying for a license. However, ownership is limited only to those “loyal to the state.” Citing “personal security reasons,” it is clear that this is a policy to arm civilians who are military loyalists, as the military simply cannot win on the ground. It is a desperate measure.
Another leaked document shows that the Myanmar military’s battalion strength is typically down to 50 soldiers, significantly below its usual numbers of around 150-200. Given the lack of success on the battlefield, it is of no surprise that the junta has been increasingly relying on airstrikes in its war of terror to try and annihilate the people’s resistance. This has been a trend since the end of the rainy season, with more aircraft bought from China and Russia. In the past week, the town of Thantlang in Chin State, which had already experienced mass violence in 2021 with the junta burning down two thirds of the town’s houses and 30 public buildings including several churches, has come under sustained aerial attack. The resistance forces had occupied the town’s main police station, and the junta has retaliated using indiscriminate bombing, occurring on a daily basis since February 10. On the other side of the country, in northern Karen State, a Karen National Union statement reveals that the junta launched 57 airstrikes in January alone, dropping over 200 bombs and killing at least 16 civilians, including a two-year-old child. Meanwhile, in northern Shan State, battlefield losses resulted in the junta calling in more airstrikes against the Kachin Independence Army after intense clashes.
In Sagaing Region, it is reported that the junta has burned down an estimated 2,000 homes in just three days last week, bringing the total to over 43,000 in Sagaing Region alone since May 2021. This uptick in arson since the end of last year appears to be worsening, coming shortly after the imposition of martial law in an additional 37 townships in Myanmar. This dispenses with any semblance that the military will defer to civilian governance, and ostensibly gives them power to arrest, charge, and sentence anyone, including the death sentence, bypassing what little is left of the judicial system. Despite these apparent new powers, the reality is that these townships are mostly under the control of people’s resistance organizations and the only way that the junta can make its presence felt is by inflicting horrific violence and destruction, such as the burning of people’s homes. The junta does not govern here, it only destroys.
While the increased use of airstrikes has already become an entrenched pattern, the liberalization of gun law ownership and the imposition of martial law show that devastating airstrikes are not enough for the junta. The people’s resistance, in both its civilian and armed forms, remains resolute, but the junta will only resort to more destructive measures as it desperately attempts to take control of the country.
However, despite the firm resistance of the people, the humanitarian impacts of such desperation are huge. At least 1.2 million people have been displaced in Myanmar since the start of the coup attempt two years ago and up to a third of the country – 17 million people – are in need of humanitarian support according to the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, which present conservative figures of displacement. Despite this, the UN is targeting less people for humanitarian assistance in 2023 compared to last year while UNOCHA itself lacks access to the displaced populations in need. To make matters worse, the junta’s nepotism, corruption, incompetence, and measures aimed to deliberately punish people mean that the economy is tanking as people struggle to make ends meet.
It is thus welcome that the US recently announced $50million in humanitarian aid to the people of Myanmar with much of this assistance going to Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh. However, major funding gaps remain and any future assistance or initiatives of international organizations involved in Myanmar must not be delivered in partnership with the very creators of this crisis. Rather, the networks of Myanmar community and civil society-based organizations, including ethnic health providers, that have the expertise, capacity and trust of the people on the ground, must be the primary implementers of such humanitarian missions. The junta’s cruelty knows no bounds, and it is getting more desperate. International and regional allies of the Spring Revolution must be ready to, in partnership with Myanmar civil society, strategically respond by supporting the essential, locally-led humanitarian resistance that Myanmar needs, particularly through cross-border assistance.
_______________________
[1] One year following the 1988 pro-democracy uprising, the former military junta changed the country’s name from Burma to Myanmar overnight. Progressive Voice uses the term ‘Myanmar’ in acknowledgement that most people of the country use this term. However, the deception of inclusiveness and the historical process of coercion by the former State Peace and Development Council military regime into usage of ‘Myanmar’ rather than ‘Burma’ without the consent of the people is recognized and not forgotten. Thus, under certain circumstances, ‘Burma’ is used.
By All Burma Federation of Student Unions
Food cuts in Bangladesh will have “devastating consequences” for Rohingya refugees
By Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK
Myanmar: Political Parties Law Shackles Opposition
By Human Rights Watch
Handover note of the special envoy of the ASEAN Chair on Myanmar 2022
By Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Cambodia
By Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Singapore
By National Unity Government of Myanmar
Statement on Singapore’s prohibition of arms and dual-use item transfers to Myanmar
By National Unity Government of Myanmar
Bangladesh: UN experts appeal for immediate funding to avert food ration cuts for Rohingya refugees
By Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
By Save the Children
By United States Department of State
United States Announces Additional $50 Million in Humanitarian Assistance for the People of Burma
By United States Agency for International Development
Sweden to support Rohingya refugees with USD 7.6 million
By United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Lack of funds forces WFP to cut rations for Rohingya in Bangladesh
By World Food Programme
Burma/Myanmar: Sustained nationwide resistance blocks Illegal junta from gaining control
By ALTSEAN-Burma, Initiatives for International Dialogue, Progressive Voice, Commission for the Disappeared and Victims of Violence (KontraS) , ASEAN Youth Forum
“We Cannot Move Freely” The Impacts of Martial Law on Civilians in Southeastern Burma
By Human Rights Foundation of Monland
Breaking Gender and Age Barriers amid Myanmar’s Spring Revolution
By International Crisis Group
Myanmar Digital Coup Quarterly: November 2022 – January 2023
By Myanmar Internet Project, EngageMedia
Neighbours That Will Pick The Right Horse – Issue 92
By Myanmar Peace Monitor
By Shan State Frontline Investment Monitor
Refugee Camp Population: January 2023 by The Border Consortium
By The Border Consortium
Progressive Voice is a participatory, rights-based policy research and advocacy organization that was born out of Burma Partnership. Burma Partnership officially ended its work on October 10, 2016 transitioning to a rights-based policy research and advocacy organization called Progressive Voice. For further information, please see our press release “Burma Partnership Celebrates Continuing Regional Solidarity for Burma and Embraces the Work Ahead for Progressive Voice.”